By Ginggay Hontiveros-Malvar, Chief Reputation and Sustainability Officer, and Aboitiz Group and President, Aboitiz Foundation
This article originally appeared on the author’s Tribune.net column ‘On the G(ood) Side’.
Among the most powerful sustainable development solutions available today, forests remain both underappreciated and undervalued. They store carbon, regulate water, and sustain millions of livelihoods. Yet forest carbon projects are often viewed only as a tool for offsetting emissions. When designed well, these projects generate long-term economic, environmental, and social returns much like a business-as-usual investment portfolio.
More than a carbon sink, a healthy forest is a living system that strengthens climate resilience. Trees stabilize soils, regulate rainfall, and protect watersheds that feed farms and cities alike. Projects that conserve or restore forests also help maintain biodiversity and protect ecosystems that act as natural infrastructure. Investing in forest carbon means funding the resilience of entire regions, not merely paying to capture carbon.
The real strength of these projects lies in their co-benefits. Around the world, communities living in and around forests are often the best stewards of the land. When they’re given legal recognition, fair compensation, and access to sustainable livelihoods, deforestation drops and prosperity rises. Carbon revenues can fund schools, clinics, and renewable energy systems. These are investments that strengthen both communities and ecosystems. This alignment of environmental outcomes with economic opportunity is what sustainable development looks like in practice.
This investment model presents a dual mandate of strong returns and long-term durability. Projects that integrate strong governance and social participation are less vulnerable to failure, fraud, or market volatility. The success of the carbon market won’t be measured by how many tons of carbon we claim to offset, but by the confidence people have in it. That means measurable impact, transparent reporting, and credible verification.
Still, accountability remains one of the sector’s biggest questions. When a project fails to deliver—due to fire, flood or mismanagement—who bears the loss: the developer or the buyer of the credits? Responsibility must be shared among stakeholders for these initiatives to succeed. Developers need to ensure quality and permanence, while buyers must move beyond short-term offsetting and invest in projects that demonstrate long-term social and environmental value. This shared accountability is what will separate credible investments from speculative ones.
The government also has a crucial role to play. Clear, science-based policies on carbon rights, land tenure, and benefit-sharing create the stable environment investors need. Well-crafted regulation unlocks innovation. Public frameworks that reward integrity and inclusivity attract private capital and accelerate nature-based solutions at scale.
The opportunity before us is enormous. Forest carbon projects can deliver biodiversity protection, rural development and climate mitigation all at once. But seizing it requires that we treat these projects not as feel-good offsets, but as strategic investments in the planet’s infrastructure.
